Movies
#0
#0
Sequels are worse than their originals
#1
Edward Norton
#0
Brad Pitt
#0
Yes, I do like 3D movies
#2
No, I don’t like 3D movies
-
#1Jesse [46]
5-9-2011 | 11:30 amMost 3D movies use horrible 3D effects. It’s nothing more than a gimmick. It doesn’t enhance the movie enjoyment at all.
0 
0 - #2Anonymous [1538]
5-16-2011 | 4:24 pmStupid business
0 0
#2
Michelle Pfeiffer
- #1Jack Lowe [1]
2-10-2011 | 10:35 amI just loved the fact that she was a shy, mousy secretary in one life, and then one sexy cat of a woman in the next eight lives (or was it just seven?). While she exuded sexuality, it was also her sensuality that just burned up the screen. That one scene where she straddles Batman on the ground and then cat licks him still excites me whenever I think about it!
1 0 - #2Mistie [1]
5-4-2011 | 5:14 pmWhile both are unbelievably sexy, I have to go with Michelle on this one. She played both sides of Catwoman perfectly and believably – Shy, frightened doormat to sensual, bold, insane bad girl. Halle’s role sadly was just more criminal and such a badly written movie, she didn’t really have a chance to shine.
1 0
#0
Halle Berry
#0
The best Joker was Jack Nicholson
#1
The best Joker was Heath Ledger
- #1Lionel Alexis [2]
10-30-2010 | 3:04 pmSure I saw the amazing performance by Jack Nicholson in Burton’s version was masterful as the film itself was not worth much, however the acting of Heath Ledger was perhaps the more accurate version of the joker comics, really an interpretation sinister here to stay, at times I felt I was watching the real joker in the eye, an immortal genius of Heath Ledger, but Nicholson also captured the quintessence of the most original character in the history of comics
1 0
#3
Sylvester Stallone
- #1Anonymous [1538]
10-7-2010 | 5:37 amit is very cool
0 0 - #2Anonymous [1538]
2-23-2012 | 5:04 amwhich one is the best in use nokia 5233 or 5230
0 0 - #3Anonymous [1538]
4-13-2012 | 1:01 pmHe’s betterm
0 0
#2
Arnold Schwarzenegger
- #1SAAROJ GHIMIRE [1]
11-15-2010 | 6:48 amI THINK ARNOLD WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT WITH RAMBO COZ ARNOLD IS TERMINATOR AND NO ONE CAN
KILL HIM EXCEPT ME. 0 0 - #2Anonymous [1538]
1-5-2011 | 8:19 amthats a hard one because arnolds bigger than sly but sly knows how to fight better
0 0
#0
Yes, I love the Oscars ceremony
#0
No, I hate the Oscars ceremony
#4
Yes, Avatar actors deserve an Oscar
- #1Anonymous [1538]
2-6-2010 | 7:28 amwe prefer uppre arm for taking BP
0 0 - #2Anonymous [1538]
2-6-2010 | 3:46 pmof course, because the make us feel something that other real actors dont!
0 0 - #3Anonymous [1538]
2-13-2010 | 3:27 pmضضضضضضضضضضضضسشیصیصصص
0 0 - #4Anonymous [1538]
3-7-2010 | 10:04 pmYes they do!!! especially for their cg performance! Acting in a massive green room with next to no surroundings for reference tests ones ability to act immensely. Most people are very ignorant when it comes to this subject because they do not understand how the technology works. The next-gen motion capture suits that were developed for this film capture 95% of the actors performance in both 2d and 3d space. Its really too bad that people don’t get this because i thought the performances in the CG parts of the film were extremely convincing. The story could have been a little less predictable but some of the acting was definitely worth a nomination or two, especially because of the difficulty of acting in such an uninspiring environment.
0 0
#4
No, Avatar actors do not deserve an Oscar
- #1Al García [9]
2-16-2010 | 3:06 pmNot the actors, nor the movie itself. Sucks…
0 2 - #2Anonymous [1538]
3-3-2010 | 4:12 amIts not really acting. Its sort of like a cartoon. Maybe there needs to be a new category added to the Oscars for CG actors.
1 0 - #3Dave Metric [24]
11-9-2010 | 10:13 amNo, in order to be a “true” actor you have to demonstrate how to act with your whole body and doing to the voice for an animated character does not accomplish this.
1 0 - #4Anonymous [1538]
10-29-2011 | 5:50 pmThey can digitalize an orgasmus as well.
0 0
#3
Star Wars is better than Star Trek
- #1Anonymous [1538]
2-5-2010 | 8:31 pmStar Wars is cooler
0 0 - #2Anonymous [1538]
11-3-2010 | 9:27 pmIt´s much cooler
0 0 - #3Jesse [46]
5-8-2011 | 9:28 pmStar Wars CANON is cooler than star trek and it also has far better video games. Jedi and sith beats any political mumbo jumbo with star trek any day. I think star trek fans tend to be more realists whereas star wars appeals to true fantasy nerds. Trekkie’s like star trek because it’s a realist portrayal of humans going to space. I don’t care if we ever go to other worlds or not.
Star trek has some amazing movies but they still don’t have that special aspect that the original star wars films have.
0 0
#1
Star Trek is better than Star Wars
- #1Anonymous [1538]
2-12-2011 | 11:48 pmStar Trek has an interesting cast of characters that keep the show entertaining. Every episode involves physisophical questions, humor, and action. Also, each series poses a different point of view. The plot is not restricted to just a few characters like it is in Star Wars.
0 0
#5
Yes, I hate Popcorn at the movies
Suggested by Hombre Perplejo
- #1juko [1]
11-17-2008 | 12:41 amI hate popcorn
0 0 - #2Cloudless sulfer [1]
11-24-2008 | 9:17 pmit is overpriced and not everyone chews with their mouth closed
0 0 - #3Anonymous [1538]
1-9-2009 | 4:45 pmbad sound
0 0 - #4Jonathan Meager [30]
1-12-2009 | 7:00 pmOnly if you want it to be
0 0 - #5Denis [67]
10-13-2009 | 1:05 amI go to the movies to watch not to eat or drink or talk or something… And I don’t like somebody chewing into my ear.
0 0
#4
No, Popcorn is an integral part of cinema-going
Suggested by Hombre Perplejo
- #1Anonymous [1538]
11-3-2008 | 2:17 pmwho could hate popcorn?
0 0 - #2Rigo Vigil [14]
11-20-2008 | 8:11 amThe cinema is nothing without popcorn. What else are you going to throw at the screen if the movie is awful? Soda? I think not.
0 0 - #3Ali A [22]
1-29-2009 | 7:16 amits a good snack that doesn’t create a lot of noise
0 0 - #4James Wilson [3]
2-17-2009 | 3:48 amWhy hate popcorn? it’s got nothing against you!
0 0
#2
Paul Newman
- #1Denis [67]
10-13-2009 | 1:22 amWell, he’s a better actor.
0 0 - #2Al García [9]
2-16-2010 | 3:09 pmMore handsome and better actor… He was made for the big screen
0 0
#0
3-26-2011 | 11:58 pm
cause he is real