The best and the worst city to live in
#5
#3
The worst city to live in
-
#1diaphania [2]
7-9-2008 | 10:32 amAny city. I’d much rather live in the English countryside and stay in touch with the natural world and the changing seasons (all within easy reach of London of course!)
-
#2Anonymous [1539]
5-3-2009 | 4:27 pmAny. I live in a small town in Canada. It’s nice and quiet.
-
#3Jesse [46]
5-8-2011 | 11:40 pmButte montana.
Nobody lives there.



0
0 





6-10-2008 | 10:54 pm
NYC! BECAUSE THERE IS SO MUCH TO DO
6-14-2008 | 3:51 pm
Well, New York for young and urban people. I´d say some quiet and small city by the sea, maybe San Sebastian in Vasc Country, where I´m from.
6-14-2008 | 4:05 pm
Moscow for the same reasons
7-4-2008 | 9:55 pm
Amsterdam. Fun and mellow, and who cares about windows and coffeeshops apart from the tourists. I love it, and I’m not dutch.
5-8-2011 | 11:39 pm
Seattle!
I’ve lived here all my life and I’ve been to many other cities but I haven’t been able to find a place as awesome as Seattle so far.
There’s just as much culture and things to do as NYC and there is nature everywhere.