Starbucks vs. Dunkin’ Donuts vs. McCafé vs. Nespresso

Nespresso

0

Suggested by producciongrafica.es

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Starbucks vs. Dunkin’ Donuts vs. McCafé vs. Nespresso

McCafé (McDonald’s)

0

Suggested by producciongrafica.es

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Starbucks vs. Dunkin’ Donuts vs. McCafé vs. Nespresso

Dunkin’ Donuts

3

Suggested by producciongrafica.es

3 Becauses for “Dunkin’ Donuts”

  1. #1
    shierylssi argued:

    i really love their variety of donuts and also their ice coffee jelly.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  2. #2
    Linshaolin argued:

    It is open earllier. It has iced coffee (cream, two equals) that I can not live without.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  3. #3
    SUE argued:

    Dunkin’ Donuts all the way! I grew up in Massachusetts and that’s all we had back in the day. My sister and I even worked at Dunkin’ Donuts as teenagers! The coffee is great, I love the iced coffee, and I used to love their blueberry muffins when I worked there. Although the muffins aren’t as good as they used to be. And one more thing, they’re cheaper then Starbucks! I’m not paying $5.00 for a coffee!

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Starbucks vs. Dunkin’ Donuts vs. McCafé vs. Nespresso

Starbucks

3

Suggested by producciongrafica.es

3 Becauses for “Starbucks”

  1. #1
    TeapotJedi argued:

    Two words: Ethiopian Sidamo. Yes, I’m a coffee snob. But then, I don’t go to Starbucks for donuts either. I go to Starbucks for coffee. I don’t see why I would go to Dunkin Donuts and expect great, rare, single estate coffee. I go to Dunkin Donuts for donuts. Cheap ones, in a paper box. I go to Starbucks to try and convince them to expand their coffee lines into less represented regions. Also, for soy chai. Not donuts.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  2. #2
    Trish argued:

    Starbucks is wonderful. They offer everything from tea to really delicious coffee. I don’t drink it as much as i used to, but i definitely drink it way more than i ever eat donuts.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  3. #3
    Sandy M argued:

    I became addicted to Starbucks while living in southern CA. I love not only the coffee, and awesome frappachinos, but also the laid back atmosphere.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Burger King vs. McDonald’s

McDonald’s

4


4 Becauses for “McDonald’s”

  1. #1
    blabby argued:

    #1 French Fries, hands down. And Hi-C Orange is the best.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  2. #2
    Naman Bagga argued:

    Much better stuff

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  3. #3
    whataslacker argued:

    Well, if I am to judge it on the Burgers alone I would have to go with McDonalds. Not a fan of the fake smoke and the charred black bits on the BK burgers.

    Also the last time I went to BK they wouldn’t let me have it my way! (Supposedly out of pickles.)

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  4. #4
    Sandy M argued:

    McDonalds for their fries!

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Burger King vs. McDonald’s

Burger King

3


3 Becauses for “Burger King”

  1. #1
    BK argued:

    Better french fries, delicious, juicy chicken breast sandwiches, frame-broiled burgers, and their near constant inventions of new sandwiches.
    Not to mention some of the best breakfast sandwiches to date.
    Ask me to choose between McDonald’s floppy fries and the crisp refreshing flavor of BK’s french fries… The choice is easy.
    Plus, BK has real ingredients in their food, whereas any time I’ve had McDonald’s, I felt as if I were munching down on paper towels than potatoes.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  2. #2
    Mizé argued:

    I used to go to McDonnalds more often because my daughter loves the toys they offer in kids menus but since I discovered “Angus Burger Menu” from BK and their french fries I almost quited going to McDonnals. The harder part is convincing my daughter, because BK´s toys in Kids menus are not as nice as McDonald´s.
    I liked your site very much, great idea.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  3. #3
    ansim argued:

    Much better food!

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Corel vs. Adobe

Corel

2


2 Becauses for “Corel”

  1. #1
    catur pw argued:

    because it is light! and can create vector

     Add karma Subtract karma  --1
  2. #2
    TeapotJedi argued:

    I can use it without taking a $4000 class, and still come out with about the same result. Also, I can save my files without crashing. And as the person above pointed out, I can create vectors without a plugin. Also, I can create font sets natively and export them to multiple formats without buying any extra software. I will admit that it isn’t as good with creating PDF forms though. I have to give that one to Adobe - although the newer versions keep strangling that ability….

     Add karma Subtract karma  --1

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Corel vs. Adobe

Adobe

3


3 Becauses for “Adobe”

  1. #1
    compassreview argued:

    nice for explore everything about graphic design and allow us to create something that we can’t imagine before

     Add karma Subtract karma  +1
  2. #2
    whataslacker argued:

    It is the graphics industry standard. Easy to use (no classes needed…I am completely self taught). Most excellent online community to help with anything from tips to actual design.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +1
  3. #3
    The House of Husar argued:

    Adobe all the way. Corel is the red headed stepchild when it comes to Adobe. No offense to red headed step children of course. It is too much of THE standard and feature you can’t beat Adobe. And now with Macromedia as part of the team, well, forget about it!

     Add karma Subtract karma  +1

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Human clonation | Agree or disagree

Human beings should not be cloned

2


2 Becauses for “Human beings should not be cloned”

  1. #1
    Temlakos argued:

    Human cloning can bring no good to the society that attempts it (or even allows it). It contributes to de-humanization–the notion that human life is no more dear than any other form of life, and is reducible to a mere commodity.

    Merely because one can do a thing, is not sufficient reason to say that he must do that thing, or even that he may do that thing. Society owes it to its own posterity to lay down the law: do not tamper with the stuff of life.

    Besides: by what arrogance does anyone seriously believe that he can improve upon the Work of the Master?

     Add karma Subtract karma  +1
  2. #2
    digitalbrian argued:

    We already have a over populated world.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS

Human clonation | Agree or disagree

Human beings should be cloned

4


4 Becauses for “Human beings should be cloned”

  1. #1
    Jeremy argued:

    Throughout history, ignorance is the most constant cause of human stupidity. We can actually see a microcosm of this in todays culture. Children in modern america are raised with poor sexual education. Parents are not comfortable talking about this subject with their children, hence children are forced to live with their own imagination when it comes to this subject. This imagination often leads them astray. Many kids make it through this just fine, by first putting a toe in, then a foot, then a leg, and then perhaps jumping right in. It’s the kids who deliberately abstain until they’re 23 who have the real problems in their marriage later.

    Likewise, there is no reason to maintain our own ignorance. Eventually, humans will be cloned. It’s not a question of if, only when. Therefore, the more knowledge and experience that can be gained incrementally and carefully now will prove invaluable in the future.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  2. #2
    digitalbrian argued:

    Then we could clone Hussein and keep killing him again and again.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  3. #3
    Mr. [Mauro(Giro)] argued:

    ”I Disagree but the Clonation is interesting for Create a Immortality. Study a D.n.a. Human and Genetical of brain(s)”.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0
  4. #4
    Anonymous argued:

    Life is not sacred. This is a biased opinion expressed by the living, who have a vested interest in perpetuating this fallacy. If the dead could be heard from, they would not hold this opinion, quite the contrary, and since they greatly outnumber the living, by majority we would reverse this idea and see that cloning humans is a perfectly legitimate waste of our time here on earth.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

Why?

Every field is optional, just tell me why:

RSS