Movies

Dichotomies about movies, actors, directors, etc.

#0

Sequels are better than their originals

    #0

    Sequels are worse than their originals

      #2

      Edward Norton

      1. Joseph [5] argued:

        Edward Norton, here is a few words ” American History X” need say more. He would curb stomp Pitt.

      2. Anonymous [1698] argued:

        cause he is real

      #0

      Brad Pitt

        #0

        Yes, I do like 3D movies

          #2

          No, I don’t like 3D movies

          1. Anonymous [1698] argued:

            Stupid business

          2. Jesse [46] argued:

            Most 3D movies use horrible 3D effects. It’s nothing more than a gimmick. It doesn’t enhance the movie enjoyment at all.

          #5

          Michelle Pfeiffer

          1. Me [11] argued:

            Halle berry didn’t even play cAtwomN. It was Anne hathaway

          2. Anonymous [1698] argued:

            BECAUSE MICHELLE ROCKS!!! <3 LOVE U

          3. Joseph [5] argued:

            Her attitude, loved her looks. Halle Barry looks good too, but Michelle Pfeiffer is on another lever. She is the essence of Catwoman. Every time I think of Catwoman Michelle Pfeiffer comes to mind. She is a sexy kitten.

          4. Mistie [1] argued:

            While both are unbelievably sexy, I have to go with Michelle on this one. She played both sides of Catwoman perfectly and believably – Shy, frightened doormat to sensual, bold, insane bad girl. Halle’s role sadly was just more criminal and such a badly written movie, she didn’t really have a chance to shine.

          5. Jack Lowe [1] argued:

            I just loved the fact that she was a shy, mousy secretary in one life, and then one sexy cat of a woman in the next eight lives (or was it just seven?). While she exuded sexuality, it was also her sensuality that just burned up the screen. That one scene where she straddles Batman on the ground and then cat licks him still excites me whenever I think about it!

          #0

          Halle Berry

            #1

            The best Joker was Jack Nicholson

            1. Joseph [5] argued:

              Both did a great job in capturing Joker, but never was a fan of heath ledgers choice of make up. His Joker look does not look like the comic book joker. That the reason I leaned on Jack Side. Both again did a great job in interpreting joker their way. But based capturing jokers look Heath ledger falls short. Joker is suppose to look slick not like a homeless guy with bad hair.

            #1

            The best Joker was Heath Ledger

            1. Lionel Alexis [2] argued:

              Sure I saw the amazing performance by Jack Nicholson in Burton’s version was masterful as the film itself was not worth much, however the acting of Heath Ledger was perhaps the more accurate version of the joker comics, really an interpretation sinister here to stay, at times I felt I was watching the real joker in the eye, an immortal genius of Heath Ledger, but Nicholson also captured the quintessence of the most original character in the history of comics

            #3

            Sylvester Stallone

            1. Anonymous [1698] argued:

              He’s betterm

            2. Anonymous [1698] argued:

              which one is the best in use nokia 5233 or 5230

            3. Anonymous [1698] argued:

              it is very cool

            #2

            Arnold Schwarzenegger

            1. Anonymous [1698] argued:

              thats a hard one because arnolds bigger than sly but sly knows how to fight better

            2. SAAROJ GHIMIRE [1] argued:

              I THINK ARNOLD WOULD WIN IN A FIGHT WITH RAMBO COZ ARNOLD IS TERMINATOR AND NO ONE CAN
              KILL HIM EXCEPT ME.

            #0

            Yes, I love the Oscars ceremony

              #1

              No, I hate the Oscars ceremony

              1. Joseph [5] argued:

                I don’t like to watch people get awards for playing pretend. Oscars awards are just a waste of time.

              #4

              Yes, Avatar actors deserve an Oscar

              1. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                Yes they do!!! especially for their cg performance! Acting in a massive green room with next to no surroundings for reference tests ones ability to act immensely. Most people are very ignorant when it comes to this subject because they do not understand how the technology works. The next-gen motion capture suits that were developed for this film capture 95% of the actors performance in both 2d and 3d space. Its really too bad that people don’t get this because i thought the performances in the CG parts of the film were extremely convincing. The story could have been a little less predictable but some of the acting was definitely worth a nomination or two, especially because of the difficulty of acting in such an uninspiring environment.

              2. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                ضضضضضضضضضضضضسشیصیصصص

              3. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                of course, because the make us feel something that other real actors dont!

              4. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                we prefer uppre arm for taking BP

              #4

              No, Avatar actors do not deserve an Oscar

              1. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                They can digitalize an orgasmus as well.

              2. Dave Metric [24] argued:

                No, in order to be a “true” actor you have to demonstrate how to act with your whole body and doing to the voice for an animated character does not accomplish this.

              3. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                Its not really acting. Its sort of like a cartoon. Maybe there needs to be a new category added to the Oscars for CG actors.

              4. Al García [9] argued:

                Not the actors, nor the movie itself. Sucks…

              #3

              Star Wars is better than Star Trek

              1. Jesse [46] argued:

                Star Wars CANON is cooler than star trek and it also has far better video games. Jedi and sith beats any political mumbo jumbo with star trek any day. I think star trek fans tend to be more realists whereas star wars appeals to true fantasy nerds. Trekkie’s like star trek because it’s a realist portrayal of humans going to space. I don’t care if we ever go to other worlds or not.

                Star trek has some amazing movies but they still don’t have that special aspect that the original star wars films have.

              2. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                It´s much cooler

              3. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                Star Wars is cooler

              #1

              Star Trek is better than Star Wars

              1. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                Star Trek has an interesting cast of characters that keep the show entertaining. Every episode involves physisophical questions, humor, and action. Also, each series poses a different point of view. The plot is not restricted to just a few characters like it is in Star Wars.

              #5

              Yes, I hate Popcorn at the movies

              Suggested by Hombre Perplejo

              1. Denis [67] argued:

                I go to the movies to watch not to eat or drink or talk or something… And I don’t like somebody chewing into my ear.

              2. Jonathan Meager [30] argued:

                Only if you want it to be

              3. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                bad sound

              4. Cloudless sulfer [1] argued:

                it is overpriced and not everyone chews with their mouth closed

              5. juko [1] argued:

                I hate popcorn

              #4

              No, Popcorn is an integral part of cinema-going

              Suggested by Hombre Perplejo

              1. James Wilson [3] argued:

                Why hate popcorn? it’s got nothing against you!

              2. Ali A [22] argued:

                its a good snack that doesn’t create a lot of noise

              3. Rigo Vigil [14] argued:

                The cinema is nothing without popcorn. What else are you going to throw at the screen if the movie is awful? Soda? I think not.

              4. Anonymous [1698] argued:

                who could hate popcorn?

              #2

              Paul Newman

              1. Al García [9] argued:

                More handsome and better actor… He was made for the big screen

              2. Denis [67] argued:

                Well, he’s a better actor.

              #0

              Robert Redford

                | |